Diskussion:Söl'
Nei kirew beganLetzter Kommentar: föör 8 juaren von Flinga in Abschnitt An old template from the article code
An old template from the article code
[Kweltekst bewerke]In between hide-tags I found this old template in the article. I'll paste it here in case it is of any use. Flinga (Diskuschuun) 01:13, 2. Apr. 2017 (CEST)
| Söl (Sylt) | |
|---|---|
|
| |
 | |
| Geogr. Breedji | 53/41/14/Nuurd |
| Geogr. Lengdi | 09/40/09/Uast |
| Bundslön | Schleeswig-Holstiin |
| Krais | Nuurđfriislön |
| Amt | Andreas-Nielsen-Str. 1 25980 Söl/Weesterlön |
| Hoogdi aur NN | 5 - 52,5 m Hoogst Stair: Uwedünem |
| Gurthair | 99.14 km² |
| Iinuuners | 21.190 (2008) |
| Postkeentaal | 25980 |
| Fiirsnakifuarwaal | 04651 |
| Autokeenteeken | NF |
| Gimiinden | Söl, Hörnem, Woningstair-Brēderep, Kaamp, List |
- @Flinga: In the beginning of the frr project we experimented a lot with templates from fywiki, dawiki, enwiki, dewiki, as we were newbies in wiki scripting alltogether. Meanwhile our 'shape' looks like dewiki mainly, and 'de' also is our first fallback language. --Murma174 (Diskuschuun) 10:40, 2. Apr. 2017 (CEST)
- Murma174: good to know! :) The old templates themselves seems like a completely normal thing, every Wikipedia has developed in that way, and I've seen old and a bit primitive templates still in use. Flinga (Diskuschuun) 15:11, 2. Apr. 2017 (CEST)